From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Aug 2 00:53:33 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA09815 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 00:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bugs.us.dell.com (bugs.us.dell.com [143.166.169.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA09808 for ; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 00:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ant.us.dell.com (ant.us.dell.com [198.64.66.34]) by bugs.us.dell.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id CAA27462; Sat, 2 Aug 1997 02:51:38 -0500 Message-Id: <3.0.2.32.19970802025130.006c2488@bugs.us.dell.com> X-Sender: tony@bugs.us.dell.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.2 (32) Date: Sat, 02 Aug 1997 02:51:30 -0500 To: Tom Samplonius , Craig Johnston From: Tony Overfield Subject: Re: Pentium II? Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk At 09:08 AM 7/30/97 -0700, Tom Samplonius wrote: > >On Wed, 30 Jul 1997, Craig Johnston wrote: >> >> The real issue is that the PII is untried ... > > Hardly untried, just souped up Pentium technology. The Pentium II is a souped up Pentium Pro. - Tony