From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 22:55:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E8716A418; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B00813C448; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0BMRRte011493; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:27:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0BMRRoH011490; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:27:27 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:27:27 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: <20080111205704.GE4787@soaustin.net> Message-ID: <20080111152611.J11483@wonkity.com> References: <20080111205704.GE4787@soaustin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:27:27 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Coverity problems? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:55:07 -0000 On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 09:12:27PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> These numbers seem strange and out of proportion. I know there has been >> prior cooperation with Coverity - is this just old data? > > IIRC Coverity is not tracking our use of their software, at least in > those statistics. Someone was telling me yesterday that was because > we have our own copy of the Coverity server which we use, rather than > accessing the one on their site that generates the statistics. > > Someone, please correct me if I'm wrong. You're right. See the January 11, 2008 note here: http://scan.coverity.com/ -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA