Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jul 2021 09:14:34 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        rwmaillists@googlemail.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Periodic rant about SCHED_ULE
Message-ID:  <5482bee3-e033-c605-b380-ca3493be7492@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210719013743.0590b1f2@gumby.homeunix.com>
References:  <13445948-7804-20b4-4ae6-aaac14d11e87@m5p.com> <20210708101907.0be3a3c2@rimwks.local> <20210714164745.0128ea15@gumby.homeunix.com> <b24a2124-fd4a-0ae6-944e-4d39d590794c@heuristicsystems.com.au> <8239e474-fc36-b8aa-93b7-39197534cd30@heuristicsystems.com.au> <20210719013743.0590b1f2@gumby.homeunix.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 19/07/2021 03:37, RW via freebsd-hackers wrote:
> I haven't got time to look into this in detail but from a cursory
> examination it looks like there must be some kind of translation between
> the PRI values seen in top and the priorities used in the scheduler.

Yes. top's priority is the real priority - 100.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5482bee3-e033-c605-b380-ca3493be7492>