From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 31 8:33:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gate5.de (gatekeeper.gate5.de [212.84.193.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7145E37B406 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cc@localhost) by albert.gate5.de (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7VFLfO00936 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:21:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from cc@devcon.net) X-Authentication-Warning: albert.gate5.de: cc owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:21:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Christian Carstensen X-X-Sender: To: Subject: ufs ext attr problem... Message-ID: X-NCC-RegId: de.devcon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, it seems like there's a problem in ffs_unmount, ffs_vfsops.c:841: if ufs_extattr_stop() returns EOPNOTSUPP, calling ufs_extattr_uepm_destroy two lines later will cause a panic("ufs_extattr_uepm_destroy: not initialized") in ufs_extattr.c:175, at least on my machine. maybe, ufs_extattr_uepm_destroy() should be enclosed in a else statement in ffs_vfsops.c? best, christian -- "Sorry, no defects found. Please try a different search" [http://www.cisco.com/support/bugtools/bugtool.shtml] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message