From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 24 23:35:24 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA03611 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:35:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from wat-border.sentex.ca (sentex-uu.sentex.ca [209.167.167.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA03603 for ; Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:35:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from gravel (ospf-wat.sentex.net [209.167.248.81]) by wat-border.sentex.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id CAA09293 for ; Mon, 25 Jan 1999 02:35:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990125024220.02ad1e60@granite.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtancsa@granite.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 02:42:20 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: What is the Final EOL Disposition of v2.2.8? In-Reply-To: <3419.917248557@zippy.cdrom.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:15 PM 1/24/99 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: >That sounds like a good idea. We may also want to make a 2.2S CDROM >which contains the very last of everything done on the 2.2 branch. >From what I've heard so far, there would be demand for something >containing the very last packages/XFree86/2.2 snap/... for the branch >and if we needed to go to 6 CDs on it, we could even do that if that >meant making the last CD distro a truly comprehensive "cap" to the 2.2 >branch. What do people think? I would like to see that. Although I am sure 3.0 STABLE is a great branch already, there are a few situations where I personally will be deploying a few 2.2STABLE boxes in the next month or so, and I have a lot of boxes that are running and will be running 2.2STABLE simply because... well, they are so damn stable! I imagine I will at some time or another be adding the odd port here and there to those machines, so a monster CD set, or a site on the net would be helpful. BTW, is there a consensus that 3.x is stable enough to deploy into production ? Or should I wait for 3.1 RELEASE ? I am thinking specifically for news... ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 Canada * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message