Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:28:43 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers? Message-ID: <CAHu1Y72_xsgc8HFWaVvfd-w=tx-go7K7_-pGp0zVWnmoh9EAng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011708310.3457@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <CACxnZKM__Lt9LMabyUC_HOCg2zsMT=3bpqwVrGj16py1A=qffg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011048010.2497@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CAPj0R5%2BLcKUGijT17W6RXBz_KQxz5nZYP0vfPY3HNxNEyw0Eaw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011435430.20357@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206010952050.9474@sas1.nber.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011708310.3457@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > Better=random read performance of single drive. What an entirely useless performance measure! Maybe you should restrict yourself to using SSDs, which have rather unbeatable random read performance - the spindle speed is really high. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y72_xsgc8HFWaVvfd-w=tx-go7K7_-pGp0zVWnmoh9EAng>