From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  1 15:28:44 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2451065670
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  1 Jun 2012 15:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com)
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com
	[209.85.160.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD798FC15
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  1 Jun 2012 15:28:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pbbro2 with SMTP id ro2so3347724pbb.13
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:28:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=z3qE8FaQn9pBKjdY07Er9OdMHM4X++YH62ObJ5woeNY=;
	b=CoPJ7ODqXwJOYrREeKy3tzv/r+XtEYQjfX83ZpJz2Ep4NsL8IJ7VhrQvScyckUWZZF
	HeOG8DcAK3pEsQGPdewDJcgE1gy/A46l7KffoksNx46FIUnfNxKq34MS4hqTeG848/Er
	FL1QlOTzPhyUYECOVNgSVAsFJnfaec74i9VwydZ0nzlCD/4onc3isAV9fSFiYSDYQDuI
	YHf/sO+peKEVKBqWN3UATMnakBPhKs/hluh9ObtMTQECR0IIx5tkPygu5YgAi3tsT180
	RCC/S0rl04ZIARY2JE80SrqnNyIK312YkmrcTxZyr4w72ib/IcAF2I4FS48KtSGUQqFJ
	r7eg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.232.103 with SMTP id tn7mr11044187pbc.86.1338564523983;
	Fri, 01 Jun 2012 08:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.202.8 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:28:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011708310.3457@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <CACxnZKM__Lt9LMabyUC_HOCg2zsMT=3bpqwVrGj16py1A=qffg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011048010.2497@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CAPj0R5+LcKUGijT17W6RXBz_KQxz5nZYP0vfPY3HNxNEyw0Eaw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011435430.20357@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1206010952050.9474@sas1.nber.org>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206011708310.3457@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 08:28:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAHu1Y72_xsgc8HFWaVvfd-w=tx-go7K7_-pGp0zVWnmoh9EAng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkhm8nm+1oOXF+1z/rICG9LpwtmbmY7rcyQdrBm9GD7/ugUHtRwKRTySD1d95l4la+6jmng
Subject: Re: Anyone using freebsd ZFS for large storage servers?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:28:44 -0000

On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 8:16 AM, Wojciech Puchar
<wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote:

> Better=random read performance of single drive.

What an entirely useless performance measure!  Maybe you should
restrict yourself to
using SSDs, which have rather unbeatable random read performance - the
spindle speed
is really high. ;-)