From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Sep 30 11:55: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail.shell-server.com (24-109-11-245.ivideon.com [24.109.11.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7632C37B401 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2001 11:55:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13528 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2001 17:54:58 -0000 Received: from betsy.shell-server.com (HELO there) (192.168.3.2) by erin-rl0.shell-server.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2001 17:54:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Bart Kus Message-Id: <200109301226.0779@EO> To: Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: sio modification Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:56:02 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <3802.1001864301@critter> In-Reply-To: <3802.1001864301@critter> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sunday 30 September 2001 10:38, you wrote: > Your machine will not work too well if it is 40kHz. > > The PPS-API allows you to timestamp edges on DCD, if the frequency is > more reasonable, that would work for you. Find RFC27xx for more info > about PPS-API. Oh really. I was actually reading pps.c, and it looked like it was for the parallel port interrupt pin only. I'd rather avoid cutting up this connector if I can. Is the DCD edge timestamp (which would be PERFECT) already implemented, or is this a spec for me to write for when modifying sio.c? If I do have to write something, for my work to be included anywhere, I should be writing for the -CURRENT kernel, right? I presently run -STABLE, so that would obviously be the more comfortable kernel to write for...but it is *STABLE* after all. --Bart PS: That's RFC2783 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message