From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 29 13:00:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021AE16A403 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAAB43D49 for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rnsanchez@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so378593nzn for ; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:00:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AcKzSnG4HLGpl/u38JXcIBms/J/A/b24w4ED+82wtGD2Z1PYScVYluDkonbBW1rWomt5mXdj2ZSpiDHNVNdQE/a79l+AHhJyYmOTQjRglMHC+4JIo+u4bssLajdgUotm9AFW5xlb7byteOoyOMeKsIJL9XweFLuZp/0WCY2RbJc= Received: by 10.65.15.17 with SMTP id s17mr3607091qbi; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.lan.box ( [200.203.37.180]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id e16sm3419036qbe.2006.09.29.06.00.31; Fri, 29 Sep 2006 06:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:00:28 -0300 From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez To: Xin LI Message-Id: <20060929100028.9758c59e.rnsanchez@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <451C8615.60402@delphij.net> References: <200609280932.k8S9WMid068222@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060928133035.082e359d.rnsanchez@gmail.com> <451C8615.60402@delphij.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src ObsoleteFiles.inc X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 13:00:38 -0000 On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 10:33:57 +0800 LI Xin wrote: > > Just asking: isn't/wasn't it 3 days the minimum MFC interval? > > Em... I am not quite sure and just checked the dev-model, which has > said 3 days is the minimum, so it seems that you are correct. > > The only reason is that we are near BETA-2 and the change is trivial in > my opinion, so I would respect the current tradition and re@'s decision. Makes sense to me (trivial + BETA deadlines), thanks for clarifying :) Regards. -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."