From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Sun Dec 10 15:42:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C544E8F248; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org (repo.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6068::e6a:0]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66A9974F35; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from repo.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.37]) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id vBAFfx3e096674; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:41:59 GMT (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from feld@localhost) by repo.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id vBAFfxsr096672; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:41:59 GMT (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201712101541.vBAFfxsr096672@repo.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: repo.freebsd.org: feld set sender to feld@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Mark Felder Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:41:59 +0000 (UTC) To: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r455901 - head/security/vuxml X-SVN-Group: ports-head X-SVN-Commit-Author: feld X-SVN-Commit-Paths: head/security/vuxml X-SVN-Commit-Revision: 455901 X-SVN-Commit-Repository: ports MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 15:42:00 -0000 Author: feld Date: Sun Dec 10 15:41:59 2017 New Revision: 455901 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/455901 Log: Document FreeBSD-SA-17:12.openssl Modified: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Modified: head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml ============================================================================== --- head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Sun Dec 10 15:39:38 2017 (r455900) +++ head/security/vuxml/vuln.xml Sun Dec 10 15:41:59 2017 (r455901) @@ -58,6 +58,63 @@ Notes: * Do not forget port variants (linux-f10-libxml2, libxml2, etc.) --> + + FreeBSD -- OpenSSL multiple vulnerabilities + + + FreeBSD + 11.111.1_6 + 10.410.4_5 + 10.310.3_26 + + + + +

Problem Description:

+

Invoking SSL_read()/SSL_write() while in an error state + causes data to be passed without being decrypted/encrypted + directly from the SSL/TLS record layer.

+

In order to exploit this issue an application bug would + have to be present that resulted in a call to + SSL_read()/SSL_write() being issued after having already + received a fatal error. [CVE-2017-3737]

+

There is an overflow bug in the x86_64 Montgomery + multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit + moduli. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 + but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). + [CVE-2017-3738] This bug only affects FreeBSD 11.x.

+

Impact:

+

Applications with incorrect error handling may inappropriately + pass unencrypted data. [CVE-2017-3737]

+

Mishandling of carry propagation will produce incorrect + output, and make it easier for a remote attacker to obtain + sensitive private-key information. No EC algorithms are + affected and analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and + DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to + perform and are not believed likely.

+

Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible + (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary + to deduce information about a private key may be performed + offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack + would be very significant and likely only accessible to a + limited number of attackers. However, for an attack on TLS + to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 + private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an + option since CVE-2016-0701. [CVE-2017-3738]

+ +
+ + CVE-2016-0701 + CVE-2017-3737 + CVE-2017-3738 + SA-17:12.openssl + + + 2017-12-09 + 2017-12-10 + +
+ wireshark -- multiple security issues