From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org  Fri Sep 18 17:29:50 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D59C9CE19F
 for <freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A6E61064
 for <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t8IHTnO7036143
 for <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:29:49 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 200169] ipfw table list uses IPv6 format for zero IPv4 addresses
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:29:49 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-200169-7515-IKhHREMNb4@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-200169-7515@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-200169-7515@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 17:29:50 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200169

--- Comment #4 from commit-hook@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:

Author: melifaro
Date: Fri Sep 18 17:29:25 UTC 2015
New revision: 287963
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/287963

Log:
  MFC r266310

    Fix wrong formatting of 0.0.0.0/X table records in ipfw(8).

    Add `flags` u16 field to the hole in ipfw_table_xentry structure.
    Kernel has been guessing address family for supplied record based
    on xent length size.
    Userland, however, has been getting fixed-size ipfw_table_xentry structures
    guessing address family by checking address by IN6_IS_ADDR_V4COMPAT().

    Fix this behavior by providing specific IPFW_TCF_INET flag for IPv4
records.

  PR:        bin/189471,kern/200169

Changes:
_U  stable/10/
  stable/10/sbin/ipfw/ipfw2.c
  stable/10/sys/netinet/ip_fw.h
  stable/10/sys/netpfil/ipfw/ip_fw_table.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.