From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan  6 19:49:56 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5450816A4CE
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  6 Jan 2005 19:49:56 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4136443D1F
	for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>;
	Thu,  6 Jan 2005 19:49:55 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 06 Jan 2005 19:49:53 -0000
Received: from p3EE26E92.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO lofi.dyndns.org)
	(62.226.110.146)
	by mail.gmx.net (mp023) with SMTP; 06 Jan 2005 20:49:53 +0100
X-Authenticated: #443188
Received: from kiste.my.domain (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j06Jnk4o033346
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO);
	Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:49:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net)
From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:49:36 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2
References: <20050106174100.18034.qmail@web53908.mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050106174100.18034.qmail@web53908.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2623881.i67rEbNr1u";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501062049.40071.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
cc: phil.brennan@gmail.com
cc: stheg olloydson <stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 [allegedly]  beats FreeBSD 5.3 in server
	performance
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>,
	<mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 19:49:56 -0000

--nextPart2623881.i67rEbNr1u
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday, 6. January 2005 18:40, stheg olloydson wrote:

> I know the former is being addressed, but I don't hear anything about
> how work on SCHED_ULE is progressing.

It's at the very-least unbroken again in -CURRENT.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart2623881.i67rEbNr1u
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBB3ZZUXhc68WspdLARAty2AKCEobEcpoUjMuutGZwgP7YchFhKhACeNt4M
clWb7+rO2HY6abmqTGsm9ug=
=/oIP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2623881.i67rEbNr1u--