From owner-freebsd-chat  Tue Nov  9 14: 2:31 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Received: from umd5.umd.edu (umd5.umd.edu [128.8.10.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDB61516A
	for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue,  9 Nov 1999 14:01:58 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from howardjp@wam.umd.edu)
Received: from poirot.umd.edu (poirot.umd.edu [128.8.10.129])
	by umd5.umd.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA16229;
	Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:01:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (howardjp@localhost)
	by poirot.umd.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA20605;
	Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:01:55 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: poirot.umd.edu: howardjp owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 17:01:55 -0500 (EST)
From: James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>
X-Sender: howardjp@poirot.umd.edu
To: Sean Michael Whipkey <highway@cstone.net>
Cc: eng@cstone.net, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Quotation
In-Reply-To: <38285F15.A656E35B@cstone.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.95q.991109170125.22548A-100000@poirot.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, 9 Nov 1999, Sean Michael Whipkey wrote:

> system is distributed for free. Those that write enhancements to it are
> required to make those available to everyone. This has resulted in a

Did anyone else takes this to mean internally at his company he forces
employees to do this?

Jamie



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message