From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 07:22:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B4E16A4CE for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B8443FA3 for ; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:22:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0C3548A3; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:22:27 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 475BF6D455; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:22:27 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 09:22:27 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: David Leimbach Message-ID: <20031125152227.GC48007@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , David Leimbach , "M. Warner Losh" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, gallatin@cs.duke.edu References: <20031125012208.GD46761@dan.emsphone.com> <200311251214.23290.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <16322.46449.554372.358751@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20031124.190904.127666948.imp@bsdimp.com> <45D3EC00-1EEE-11D8-B368-000A95AFBEB4@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45D3EC00-1EEE-11D8-B368-000A95AFBEB4@mac.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i-ja.1 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: gallatin@cs.duke.edu cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: 40% slowdown with dynamic /bin/sh X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 15:22:31 -0000 On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 08:22:52PM -0600, David Leimbach wrote: > Yep :). > > I feel like saying "set the default to static and make the dynamic bins > the option" so > the people who can't be bothered to compile their own system even > though everyone > I know does this for tuning purposes anyway can stop whining. > > But I won't say that. I feel we need to pressure to improve the performance of dynamic linking. This is not really different from anything else we do in -CURRENT: some things we have to throw out there before it is perfect, in order to reach critical mass. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine NTT/Verio SME FreeBSD UNIX Heimdal nectar@celabo.org jvidrine@verio.net nectar@freebsd.org nectar@kth.se