From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 20:45:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7396B16A4CE for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:45:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D4C43D39 for ; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:45:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2Q4jNse061436; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:45:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2Q4jLm4061435; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:45:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 20:45:21 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Dan Foster Message-ID: <20040326044521.GA61327@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040324174642.GB18920@anyware12.anyware> <20040324181628.GB6200@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040326042741.GA16229@gblx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040326042741.GA16229@gblx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/63192: mutt change breaks vim syntax highlighting X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 04:45:24 -0000 On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 04:27:41AM +0000, Dan Foster wrote: > This appears to be why vim developers will not commit the patch, and > they seem to be on solid ground with that position given the reasoning. Can you forward what they said? No need to spam GNATs with it. > So I would, therefore, like to politely request reconsideration of the > proposed vim patch for inclusion to the FreeBSD vim port or to have the > mutt patch-mktemp patch backed out. You forgot to CC the Mutt maintainer to see if he thinks we should keep the mutt patch. :-) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)