From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 29 07:31:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8834E16A41F for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:31:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@ugcs.caltech.edu) Received: from riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu (riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu [131.215.176.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC4D43D46 for ; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:31:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jd@ugcs.caltech.edu) Received: by riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu (Postfix, from userid 3640) id 239E545804; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by riyal.ugcs.caltech.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB57E45802; Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 00:31:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Jon Dama To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <4312AEE0.8080806@mac.com> Message-ID: References: <200508282330.09302.dinom@balstonresearch.com> <20050829033739.GV26920@bunrab.catwhisker.org> <200508290213.12978.dinom@balstonresearch.com> <4312A9CD.8040008@freebsd.org> <4312AEE0.8080806@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sysinstall automatic filesystem size generation. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 07:31:36 -0000 Um, that they may be but... I was under the impression (mistaken?) that /tmp is a directory defined under the POSIX standard and is in fact supposed to be flushed in those cases, and that /var/tmp is to be used for programs desiring persistant storage across shutdowns (scheduled and unscheduled). Perhaps it only says that a program is not allowed to rely on /tmp being persistent. I don't have a copy at hand :-/ -Jon On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Jon Dama wrote: > > yes, that's quite generous. > > > > why isn't /tmp just an mfs mount though? > > While I like that suggestion personally, some people get perturbed about files > in /tmp going away if the power fails or you reboot. > > -- > -Chuck >