From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 17 04:26:31 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9DD1065698;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A85E8FC21;
	Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=simple; s=one; d=codelabs.ru;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:Sender;
	b=DCdZronzZtGaZIYDuIjbs3Qg+6BnUtcf7ygBpKGBTDddB2XIo/CrCMB4zhHULKFUDJc64SNB8xllqlsLm7JQZUNYme4d7K1/G8PHlehOTIAnLbkWXTXnDoMUUJZlXUZQketPuAE/i83G+G9cewX3y55XmSVfulstLeMXSwuM9RQ=;
Received: from void.codelabs.ru (void.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.25])
	by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	id 1MGmjG-0006Eq-Dg; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:26:30 +0400
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:26:27 +0400
From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <k+9khAZnafPFfFU0wKmc9RlPP/Y@j4OYE6OL8eALCd4BvSxIfwgoxSc>
References: <20090602222445.2F6017302F@freebsd-current.sentex.ca>
	<20090603194453.GA43137@alchemy.franken.de>
	<k2BOEYfMcn9Q2wvaWZK0dLZVLhc@BpFm1zkZmHABxHH1eUOcQSRoWTc>
	<200906040802.27057.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<Rj7Fi0Uz71tB6gaY5wX5iV4Wqak@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Rj7Fi0Uz71tB6gaY5wX5iV4Wqak@XX1fo6zQUfC4h0jjRC6IBz3oNH4>
Sender: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, rwatson@freebsd.org, kmacy@freebsd.org,
	Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de>
Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 04:26:31 -0000

John, good day.

Fri, Jun 05, 2009 at 10:29:56AM +0400, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:02:25AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 11:26:17 pm Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> > > Yes, seems like so.  John, may be we can eliminate the only reference to
> > > KTR_PERCPU from sys/sys/pcpu.h?  Both 'struct pcpu' fields seem to be
> > > unused (grep'ped -CURRENT sources).
> > 
> > Yes.
> 
> Fine.  Then the attached patch should remove the stuff.

Could the mentioned KTR_PERCPU stuff be removed or you think that
it is better to leave it "as is"?

Thanks!
-- 
Eygene
 _                ___       _.--.   #
 \`.|\..----...-'`   `-._.-'_.-'`   #  Remember that it is hard
 /  ' `         ,       __.--'      #  to read the on-line manual
 )/' _/     \   `-_,   /            #  while single-stepping the kernel.
 `-'" `"\_  ,_.-;_.-\_ ',  fsc/as   #
     _.-'_./   {_.'   ; /           #    -- FreeBSD Developers handbook
    {_.-``-'         {_/            #