From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 13:51:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A29916A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:51:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF52943D2F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:51:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsdnews@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so272512wra for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 05:51:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=c5dwUj2ju4fsYJzi5Qvg677q6fZEp6KN8TDr3eUXZvFxEdtOlLVPhn5eX/M8pFc+eOLjCYLTPIVEJZaaRtYbLiZckjcIOkm1oulWHCi0EyDMbiUgE2fNEbBMJcszkJ6MNNjwgpxEwvuzXq3KPPb6HZoCcUNFWa5BrR5Q/q6H8gI= Received: by 10.54.15.76 with SMTP id 76mr1133434wro; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 05:51:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.50.27 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 05:51:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8292450b041207055155307a56@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 07:51:15 -0600 From: CHris Rich To: simon.burke@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <86fz2ifaml.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2d7d2dd204120614235ca769f4@mail.gmail.com> <86fz2ifaml.fsf@amidala.datadok.no> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3: cant install openoffice 1.1 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: CHris Rich List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:51:16 -0000 On 07 Dec 2004 14:25:54 +0000, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > Simon Burke writes: > > > Does anyone know if it is broken? or how i can get an openoffice > > release installed, as 1.0 is apparentlyu broken according to ports and > > 1.1 wont compile sucessfully. No it's not broken I've just compiled a couple of days ago on an updated (as of 12/4/04) 5.3-stable system > it should compile cleanly if you've set up the required java magic > first. At least that seems to be what trips up most people who try to > build openoffice from ports. Yes this I agree with this, what I did was get java to compile first, (I installed every type of jdk14 in the java ports tree) but the one that worked was /usr/ports/java/jdk14, try to make && make install that port, if you are unsuccessful pay attention to the error and edit the Makefile. (I seem to recall a problem with printf, and I *think* I commented out the lines with printf and did a make it errored out again eventually so uncommented those lines and everything installed.) Once that is done openoffice any other number of java applications should install and compile fine.