Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2000 22:48:46 -0600 From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net> To: Gary <medmanks@mindspring.com> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Basic stuff Message-ID: <200011280448.eAS4mkS48235@grumpy.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Message from Gary <medmanks@mindspring.com> of "Mon, 27 Nov 2000 19:37:15 CST." <20001127193715.6bfb5061.medmanks@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary writes: [...] > Questions, can I use many of my Linux based rpms in BSD? I guess you > folks call them porting, or some such. Its possible to use binary Linux RPM's in FreeBSD. The RPM thing is ported to a native FreeBSD binary in order to handle Linux things for Linux "emulation" in Linux ports (its not really emulation, only an ABI translation). >Also, is there support for WinTV (bttv) in the GUI. Best to ask in freebsd-multimedia. > I just joined the group, and am unsure how to > run the Linux end of it, if need be. % su # cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base # make install && make clean Or if you were to install any other FreeBSD port of a Unix binary (such as WordPerfect or Acrobat Reader) then the required Linux stuff will be installed also too. There is a loadable kernel module required for support of Linux. If you forget to say you want Linux compatibility when installing then at worst you have to put linux_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf for the next reboot, and "kldload linux" at the keyboard for immediate gratification. [...] > and whether the newer GUIs are supported, etc. GNOME and KDE native for FreeBSD follow closely behind the very latest. [...] > I don't know if you > have an something similar to SAMBA, or is it SAMBA? Its Samba. The very same. I get the impression from Linux users that they are used to collections of precompiled binaries in rpm format. Much like traditional shareware collections for DOS/Windows. When they look at FreeBSD there is confusion about our ports and packages. FreeBSD didn't have a marketing inspiration to give them catchy names such as RPM. And I sense a bit of this confusion from you. In FreeBSD when talking about an application, a "port" is a collection of Makefile rules and possibly patchfiles and scripts, which are able to download, patch, compile, and install, an application from its original sources with the command, "make install". A package is nothing but a precompiled port. Often made with "make package". I install most everything the "ports" way. In the event I suspect a FreeBSD upgrade needs recompiled applications I already have the source files in /usr/ports/distfiles and can built them very easily. One thing in particular I avoid compiling myself, cvsup, as building that binary requires building Modula-3 (if you don't have it the port will automatically recurse, fetch, and start installing everything it needs). Broke myself of building that way back when I was at sub-Pentium speed. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011280448.eAS4mkS48235>