Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 09:57:08 -0600 (CST) From: Eric Teeter <teetere@charter.net> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Asterisk ports Message-ID: <11875248.1553.1420473427249.JavaMail.Owner@Teeter1> In-Reply-To: <31385572.1549.1420473125617.JavaMail.Owner@Teeter1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Are there going to be ports for the different languages sounds for Asterisk (i.e. g772 or wav for en)? -- Eric Teeter 349 N Rutland Ave Apt 3 Brooklyn, WI 53521 (608) 455-4172 ----- No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4253/8872 - Release Date: 01/05/15 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 18:52:18 2015 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2FC329 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x232.google.com (mail-ob0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD88528F2 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:52:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f178.google.com with SMTP id gq1so62279899obb.9 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:52:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oWOUaSsi+pKCvP6nOq9HH5pHVI9piwO+qu5ne+lhoS8=; b=RJXlPvSjDP0imRp2j3OGwgyCCtlgmKwYWNUEWXcX+56804GLdu1Ay3TO1yal7TdahT 6xJmX7M5NCcNFiggDv011vG71qIB+rFhAHHTep00iAHsL8ahXBb8s5vD6nQiB7iCT0+k bQoOnewaMuVmqoDpeumhPg4EvZI0AtUjt4R+O6NwLUWvv534ekAcbQ23MdCE6tH/mEEM 5DN9LHOz2f7tMLb28KSaH7RPg04qUn5onE6CzYOPX/D24pHmxe0JCAQ4jq3wWHN5bmzc q71WIhOaNI4yOYXkc+WbFNY6MkmhWOt16xTVvlaR4WMauLGr77Ks31e3vQ6LH3sI/9xO 2PIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.175.195 with SMTP id cc3mr51587345oec.10.1420483938101; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.235.18 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:52:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.235.18 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Jan 2015 10:52:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> References: <54A67B1A.5060007@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:52:17 +0400 Message-ID: <CAGK=9AFzbn9EJGYusjfhc1BpcjEVtETd1M=RV76SnGAjpgMovg@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: poudriere: reduce the number of rebuilt packages? From: Mikhail Tsatsenko <m.tsatsenko@gmail.com> To: Stefan Ehmann <shoesoft@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>, <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 18:52:19 -0000 02 =D1=8F=D0=BD=D0=B2. 2015 =D0=B3. 14:04 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0= =BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Stefan Ehmann" <shoesoft@gmx.net> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > I've recently switched from portmaster to poudriere/'pkg upgrade' to manage my port updates. Basically it works fine, but incremental builds don't quite work as I expected. > > poudriere rebuilds all packages if any dependency has changed. If there are only some ports with new versions, possibly hundreds of packages are rebuilt. So far it looks like I'll end up rebuilding packages like libreoffice/KDE/chromium several times a week. The rebuilt packages won't even be installed by 'pkg upgrade' because their version number has not changed. Absolutely agree. A tired to rebuild kde and libreoffice each time when some port 's (Perl, python )revision bumped. > > That's a huge waste of resources. With portmaster only ports with increased version numbers are rebuilt. > > Can I use poudriere to rebuild only packages where the version number changed? > > > The option -S (Don't recrusively rebuild packages affected by other packages requiring incremental rebuild) looked promising. But automatic packages are not always rebuilt and I've also encountered build problems. CHECK_CHANGED_DEPS=3Dno doesn't seem to reduce the number of packages rebui= lt. > > Is there a way to do what I want with poudriere? Or should I switch back to portmaster? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11875248.1553.1420473427249.JavaMail.Owner>