From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 29 13:00:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04688DD; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.69.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77DAC2541; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r9TD0a5L036843; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:00:36 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r9TD0aKr036842; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:00:36 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:00:36 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 Message-ID: <20131029130036.GH52889@glebius.int.ru> References: <201310290652.r9T6qYNw059983@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20131029095721.GU52889@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 13:00:45 -0000 On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:55:57PM +0000, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: B> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: B> B> > Bjoern, B> > B> > in r256868 you said that now netback compiles w/o INET. B> B> So it had for ages according to the tinderbox with all LINT kernels, B> and it had after my change. Well, I added it to LINT only yesterday :) B> My change just also allowed a GENERIC to compile without INET as well B> (I think someone forgot to add things to NOTES and only added them to B> GENERIC but I did not get around to check that, as otherwise the B> tinderbox would have found this ages ago). B> B> The below is a NOIP kernel, which is an aditional step to no INET (in B> which case I still had INET6 support). B> I hadn't cared about NOIP, but, as said had been ok with the tinderbox B> for a long time. So something else changed since, or something else B> had been broken all the time and another change now revealed it? Yes, see above :) B> I guess it lacks #ifdef INET6 and #include "opt_inet6.h" throughout B> the file? My guess that entire function that processes packet for checksumming needs to be disabled. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.