From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Jun  4 14:00:52 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA04214
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jun 1995 14:00:52 -0700
Received: from biko.llc.org (root@biko.llc.org [199.45.69.3])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA04208
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 1995 14:00:47 -0700
Received: from [199.45.69.43] (pm-13.qbc.CLiC.Net [199.45.69.43]) by biko.llc.org (8.6.12/LLC) with SMTP id QAA21690 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 4 Jun 1995 16:57:29 -0400
X-Sender: nit@llc.org (Unverified)
Message-Id: <v01510100abf7cccc76c5@[199.45.69.37]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 1995 16:59:52 -0400
To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
From: nit@llc.org (Martin Durand)
Subject: IDE CDROMs
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Hi gang,
        do you have any time/release frame for an IDE-based CD-ROM driver ?
>From what I read, it will not make the 2.0.5R but what about 2.1 ?

I'm still not fluent in Un*x programming and Mac is more my game
programming-wise but, as network everything (tm) for the college I work
for, I do have access to varied systems (ISA, EISA, MCA, PCI), (486DX, DX2,
SLC), (IDE, SCSI, ESDI [honest!]). Honk if you need anything tested, beaten
or otherwise tortured ; between myself and CS students, if it survives, it
probably warrants getting out of the beta stage.

The CS students are already using FreeBSD 2.0 to learn Un*x administration
and found that, contrary to Linux, FreeBSD works well on 486SLC processors
(boy did I screw up when I bought those :-(


 __________________________.
 Martin Durand             | I know I should be working on my .sig file,
 nit@llc.org               | but who reads these things...