From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 2 18:00:06 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA20005 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 18:00:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtplink.pulse.com ([192.77.130.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA19930 for ; Tue, 2 Feb 1999 18:00:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Hao.Xu@pulse.com) Date: Tue, 02 Feb 1999 20:55 -0500 From: "Hao Xu" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Cc: "Hao Xu" Subject: Mbuf in Lite and Lite-2 Message-ID: <19990202205637781-1f5f04a@pulse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Could anyone tell me the major difference between Lite and Lite-2 in terms of the data structure and algorithm of the TCP/IP code? I am especially curious about the Mbuf: in Wright & Steven's TCP/IP Illustration Vol 2, they hinted that the Mbuf implementation is somewhat overcomplicated and performance sacrificed due to the expensive memory resource issue ... Any other major tcp/ip code improvement in Lite-2 or FreeBSD Rel 3.0? Thank you for your time! -Hao To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message