From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 5 23:46:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32EDA16A403; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:46:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (ns1.pittgoth.com [216.38.206.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD85F43D49; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 23:46:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k95Nkv2A026398 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:46:58 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 19:46:49 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Joel Dahl Message-Id: <20061005194649.050db2bd.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1160080308.671.27.camel@localhost> References: <200610051806.k95I6kNC001824@repoman.freebsd.org> <1160080308.671.27.camel@localhost> Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: danger@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/platforms xbox.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 23:46:59 -0000 On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 22:31:48 +0200 Joel Dahl wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 18:06 +0000, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > > danger 2006-10-05 18:06:46 UTC > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en/platforms xbox.sgml > > Log: > > Whitespace cleanup, no content changes. > > All platforms pages use different indentation (well, the truth is that > we use different indentation style everywhere on www), so, what is the > purpose of just fixing this one? > > Also, please note that I'm against bigger whitespace changes as it > causes unneeded repo churn, especially since www has a tendency to be > abused by non-doc people. ;-) > > More prominent guidelines for preferred www style would certainly be > welcome. What Tom says goes? Actually, fixing just this one was to reduce style changes and clean up some uglyness. I'm completely open to an idea of www style standardization. :) -- Tom Rhodes