From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Nov 14 00:36:06 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA11567 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 00:36:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from sos.freebsd.dk (sos.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA11526 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 00:36:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@sos.freebsd.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by sos.freebsd.dk (8.8.8/8.7.3) id JAA01286; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:36:38 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199711140836.JAA01286@sos.freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: SUID-Directories patch In-Reply-To: <199711140248.TAA12336@rocky.mt.sri.com> from Nate Williams at "Nov 13, 97 07:48:09 pm" To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 09:36:38 +0100 (MET) Cc: tlambert@primenet.com, sos@freebsd.dk, julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org From: Søren Schmidt Reply-to: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Nate Williams who wrote: > > One of the main incentives for commercial entities to give code > > back is offloading of maintenance. You can of course pick and > > choose what you want to take, but the fix seems generically > > useful > > And is in 3.0-current, but doesn't belong in 2.2. On the flip side, > just because a commercial entity donates code doesn't mean we should > take it into the source tree lock/stock/and barrel. Exactly. I wont accecpt that YOU guys offloads YOUR maintenance on our backs, we have had PLENTY of that allready, thankyou... Now kill this thread, and get back to work... -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team Even more code to hack -- will it ever end ..