From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 25 22:25:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF6C16A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:25:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEB843D39 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:25:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend3.messagingengine.com (frontend3.internal [10.202.2.152]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB8BC64616 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:25:38 -0500 (EST) X-Sasl-enc: 9m0kWFAldoKc1ZO01gC/xQ 1111789537 Received: from gumby.localhost (dsl-80-41-66-113.access.as9105.com [80.41.66.113]) by frontend3.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702C325535 for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:25:37 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:25:38 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <42448A1A.5070802@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <42448A1A.5070802@chuckr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503252225.38605.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: eclipse for amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:25:40 -0000 On Friday 25 March 2005 22:00, Chuck Robey wrote: > I wanted to build eclipse, now that I finally have a native jdk15 > working for my amd64, but I am chagined to find that the port is listed > as being for ARCH i386 only. Anyone know if this is a case of there > being a real tesstable architectural problem, or if it's merely a fact > of lack of amd64 testing? There is a specific list for AMD64, where you would be better of asking. There was a recent thread about the number of ports marked as i386 only, where it was suggested that people test them out, so their status can be changed.