Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 02:24:32 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, current@freebsd.org, bde@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Implementation errors in strtol() Message-ID: <20050121232432.GA23273@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20050121230949.GA34313@VARK.MIT.EDU> References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120222137.GE30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050121230949.GA34313@VARK.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:09:49PM -0500, David Schultz wrote: > Therefore, the errno issue is more about pragmatics than > standards-compliance. I think the two important questions are: > > o Is there lots of broken software out there that expects > errno to not be set? We have this errno setting since 2001, so any of broken software should already manifest itself but none I know of yet found. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050121232432.GA23273>