From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 18 09:17:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27F316A4CE for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:17:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (VARK.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4464543D48 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from VARK.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j3I9H5hX025630; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:17:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by VARK.MIT.EDU (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j3I9H4O1025629; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:17:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:17:04 -0400 From: David Schultz To: "=?us-ascii:iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?=" Message-ID: <20050418091704.GA25608@VARK.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: "=?us-ascii:iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?=" , freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG References: <42601B14.3080606@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42601B14.3080606@t-hosting.hu> cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Minor bug in libstdc++ compilation by make buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 09:17:07 -0000 On Fri, Apr 15, 2005, Kvesdn Gbor wrote: > Hello there, > > I was wondering why make buildworld fails and I found on some mailing > list archives that one should comment CXXFLAGS out to fix this issue. I > was also able to get around with this, but I've realized that the > problem has nothing to do with code optimization. Even if I specify a > CXXFLAGS=-O in make.conf the whole make buildworld fails. It certainly > must be some kinda Makefile deficiency and as far I see it could be > easily fixed by a programmer. And as I think it should be fixed. It > would be nice to use optimized CPP flags and have a faster and optimized > code. And many end-user would be happy to have this opportunity. > I'm looking forward to Your answer. Try CXXFLAGS+=-O instead.