From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 19:26:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59B0106566B for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C356B8FC15 for ; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 19:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so64903qwb.7 for ; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:25:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=z/SUhozKBVBnMIdXmejF3aKlSo3w3dIx5f4FPEfd25Y=; b=PoztPM/vVzAJiBD1xUkw6yGaz4C1D+pr6hp7QTOh30PMHVT5HxNl/hVSD3wMF02WG+ wi3OOxPvFrLJbsD7zUSZNlQwbNCBZmzfZ7Ee6aCxFyYilUF8Y0TsnjfeZG1WRo0+z8H1 vUIEW78zFFpxWtUE2fzN1fzMXH4Tu4ihlNrQI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=sRjxz7Dbf5KrxiNWXhu+O9d1MlVcnJltsws8VBYyQMdlGiOHbzgW0Z660mvziH9nZZ +R2gTAFv3SpVGL3wJWDHWns9eBIN9TFtW1iuWodGWO+POtQMDcO0eIiqx8so925rs/GI bxwZiJTrVp2rQLDyfuDdaX1tC/PcJRR3Se1yQ= Received: by 10.151.26.12 with SMTP id d12mr5866932ybj.102.1218137158804; Thu, 07 Aug 2008 12:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.196.13 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Aug 2008 12:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <340a29540808071225g72d35104m98730bbc912af587@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 13:25:58 -0600 From: "Andrew Falanga" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: having problems with dhcpd and bootp clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:26:01 -0000 Hi, dhcpd starts so I know that there are no problems with my configuration file (at least syntax, I suppose that a semantic error may still be present). Running dhcpd with the -d option shows this string being placed on stderr: BOOTREQUEST from via fxp0: BOOTP from dynamic client and no dynamic leases Now, what's confusing is that the MAC for this client is one in which I've specifically called out in /usr/local/etc/dhcpd.conf. This is a work machine so I can't share the config file with you (sorry I know that will make it difficult to help). This DHCP server can't hand out any addresses dynamically so I've prevented that from happening. It's only purpose is to hand out a small block of IP addresses that my team uses within a much larger subnet. None of these clients are DHCP clients, they are only BOOTP. These clients aren't actually trying to boot over the network they're just getting an address. (Yes, this probably isn't the best way, or the correct way, of doing this but I didn't set it up but I must use it). So, the long and the short of it is that our older BOOTP server has died and I'm trying to get something in place to keep us functioning. >From the manual page for dhcpd(8) subnet 239.252.197.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 { range 239.252.197.10 239.252.197.250; } If a subnet will only be provided with BOOTP service and no dynamic address assignment, the range clause can be left out entirely, but the subnet statement must appear. So, I have: subnet mysubnet netmask thenetmask { } Then, all of the host entries are: host host1 { option host-name "host1"; hardware ethernet ; fixed-address ; } I noticed that the manual page shows this for a bootp client: host haagen { hardware ethernet 08:00:2b:4c:59:23; fixed-address 239.252.197.9; filename "/tftpboot/haagen.boot"; } The verbiage used in the paragraph right above this example, in the man page, would lead one to believe that the "filename" option used in the host declarator isn't necessary, but never the less it is different than what I have and I wanted to ask. I haven't been able to track it down as yet but I'm thinking that my problem probably isn't with my host declarator sections. It probably has something to do with an option to the configuration that I haven't found yet. I'm going to keep looking, but it was time to ask for some help too. This is all running on a FreeBSD 6.2p11 box. Any help is greatly appreciated, Andy -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?