From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Jul 23 01:42:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA08553 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 01:42:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gate.gateway.net.hk (qmailr@home.gateway.net.hk [202.76.19.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA08469 for ; Thu, 23 Jul 1998 01:42:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmf@gate.gateway.net.hk) Received: (qmail 17818 invoked by uid 653); 23 Jul 1998 07:55:05 -0000 Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 15:55:05 +0800 (CST) From: Bo Fussing To: domreg cc: "Jonathan M. Bresler" , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MX CNAME In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, domreg wrote: > > "Because it is wrong" doesn't work with my kids either. > > What is the problem? Does it break anything? > > Should I go change all the ocurrences in all the domains we host? > > Or should I give mailhost the same ip-adress as the realhost instead of > giving it a cname to realhost? Leif, Most mailers will look for the hosts canonical domain name when delivering mail. If you choose to use a CNAME for your MX records there is no guarantee that you will get any mail. I think that is incentive enough to have a look through your DNS entries and boot out any CNAME entries from your MX lists. Bo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message