From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 5 10:03:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0E106566C for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bschmidt@techwires.net) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827DE8FC14 for ; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 10:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so2040376lag.13 for ; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:03:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-originating-ip:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=Q4Eb55d8UnLo6eSynqZCe55tDEOEbX7mnkCsVTxyaBc=; b=JFQXebw2N6t0m3TxnYIL8q7rQvAgh/fZoj8LDhsCiIFoTUwdA2hSKsGj29ObnjhnNI R4UEwBLWYD78ZMnsqdyraYqhqyDoN1Dppbaae5a72/1fal4g0o34tpswnvjf2sjq+q+a T4tTfG5g1CsbkdHix9Y19gLRKbOgoqgChRJ5qFp7pOhpeTdSLUKdkuqi6cqiaK02ZYTF ecTI0BsmuK6pquWXwBUCIVtAau0ri1CAH6uk0OYWGvLqOwWCj8m8OCPkG3C5QGXMPJM2 qjD23yWB4jiEx5VOHTsqfi0gvNG6quyQoLVKtEBU/S7xhA4eT9wIbGaKpBmItbVcgwAR X91w== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.108.171 with SMTP id hl11mr2210405lab.29.1333620184454; Thu, 05 Apr 2012 03:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.112.38 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Apr 2012 03:03:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [79.140.39.245] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 12:03:04 +0200 Message-ID: From: Bernhard Schmidt To: =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlTvNu9WpxEPYpo1QchORZ7jCi9mIB3LJ0D1F+AsSff4lf3Vz3//FiYdMHlTz7/R5xdXnQ2 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 1000-N is really slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2012 10:03:06 -0000 On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:57, =CB=FE=E1=EE=EC=E8=F0 =C3=F0=E8=E3=EE=F0=EE= =E2 wrote: > $ wlandebug +rate > net.wlan.0.debug: 0x20 Look into /var/log/messages or the actual debug output. > I don't know if it was this or some other wizardry, but the DS has been > changing from 54 to 48 after I ran that command. I was able to DL at 1.5+= mbs > now. Well, as long as it doesn't stick to 1Mbps you should be fine. > wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 > ether 74:e5:0b:df:a8:48 > inet 192.168.1.82 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > nd6 options=3D29 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/54Mbps mode 11g > > status: associated > ssid mreja channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g) bssid 28:16:2e:da:02:f9 > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > TKIP 2:128-bit txpower 14 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 bgscan > bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS > wme roaming MANUAL > > Issue was with 2 tested AP's, but I have 2 more FreeBSD 9.0 machines usin= g > one of those AP without problems. Ok, thanks. > I have ThinkPad X220 and was recommended Intel 1000-N over =A0Realtek > RTL8192SE / RTL8188CE. I hope the issue is gone for good. Again, not sure= if > your command helped or not. So, you also run the -ht command? --=20 Bernhard