From owner-freebsd-net Tue May 9 18:38:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from newmail.sentex.ca (newmail.sentex.ca [207.245.238.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4420437BF60 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 18:38:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite-atm.sentex.ca [209.112.4.1]) by newmail.sentex.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA38870; Tue, 9 May 2000 20:32:22 GMT (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from chimp.simianscience.com (ospf-mdt.sentex.net [205.211.164.81]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA02011; Tue, 9 May 2000 21:34:37 -0400 (EDT) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: brian@Awfulhak.org (Brian Somers) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anybody using PPPoE to to terminate customer DSL sessions? Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 01:31:57 GMT Message-ID: <3918bbc4.765910521@mail.sentex.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 9 May 2000 04:50:36 -0400, in sentex.lists.freebsd.misc you wrote: >> Was looking at using FreeBSd 4.x to terminate DSL traffic from customer >> DSLAM's. >> >> If anybody here has done that and wouldn't mind answering a couple >> questions on it, please let me know. > >I haven't actually done it in quantity, but I did write the pppoed >code. What appears to be the problem ? Not sure of the original poster's situation, but in many cases its actually terminated as a L2TP tunnel. At least thats the Redback model :-( ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message