From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 7 10:14:37 2000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 7 10:14:35 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE3237B400; Thu, 7 Dec 2000 10:14:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1445Yo-000Dy4-00; Thu, 07 Dec 2000 12:14:26 -0600 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 12:14:26 -0600 From: Ade Lovett To: Satoshi Asami Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfree86-4 Message-ID: <20001207121426.F46011@FreeBSD.org> References: <200012070631.eB76VLe22965@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200012070631.eB76VLe22965@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from asami@freebsd.org on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:31:21PM -0800 Sender: ade@lovett.com Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 10:31:21PM -0800, Satoshi Asami wrote: > The current plan is to switch over to XFree86-4 once 4.0.2, which is > supposed to have fixed PAM support, is imported (should be in a couple > of weeks -- Taguchi-san is working on it now). That way we can test > it enough before 4.3. Does the switch to 4.0.2 include turning x11/XFree86-4 into a real meta-port? I still really don't understand why we effectively have two copies of XFree86 4 in the tree. Enquiring minds and all that.. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message