Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 00:30:06 +0200 From: Lars Kristiansen <lars+lister.freebsd@adventuras.no> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: neon port won't upgrade Message-ID: <48237EEE.8040202@adventuras.no> In-Reply-To: <20080508220747.GB2922@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20080508202543.GA70286@demeter.hydra> <482367FF.3000100@adventuras.no> <20080508210247.GB70286@demeter.hydra> <20080508220747.GB2922@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson skrev: > In the last episode (May 08), Chad Perrin said: >> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:52:15PM +0200, Lars Kristiansen wrote: >>> Chad Perrin skrev: >>>> Let me know if I should take this to the ports mailing list instead of >>>> the questions mailing list. >>>> >>>> This is my problem: >>>> >>>> # portupgrade neon-0.26.4 >>>> ** Port directory not found: www/neon2 >>>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>>> - www/neon2 (port directory error) >>>> >>>> Does anyone have any troubleshooting tips for how I should deal >>>> with this? This is the first time I've had a port fail to upgrade >>>> because it suddenly seems to have ceased existing. >>> portupgrade -f -o www/neon26 neon >>> >>> seemed to work for me >> Isn't this the sort of information that should be in >> /usr/ports/UPDATING? In my case, there's nothing in that file that >> comes up when I search for the string "neon" (without quotes). > > Do you update your entire ports tree, or just certain subdirs? My copy > of /usr/ports/MOVED ( rev 1.1591 ) has the following: > > www/neon|www/neon26|2008-05-05|Moved to be able to integrate www/neon26 > > which portupgrade should have used to determine the new location of > the port. > If I understand this correctly from: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/MOVED http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/MOVED.diff?r1=1.1586;r2=1.1587;f=h http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/MOVED.diff?r1=1.1587;r2=1.1588;f=h The MOVED file was updated perhaps wrongly at first and then corrected. So we who ran pkgdb -fF in the half a day before the correction would be thrown off in this case. Question: Would an additional line had solved it, like: www/neon2|www/neon26|2008-05-05|Moved straight to www/neon26 ? Regards, Lars
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48237EEE.8040202>