From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 7 19:25:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0F816A4DD for ; Sat, 7 May 2005 19:25:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nic.ach.sch.gr (nic.sch.gr [194.63.238.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED7543DBF for ; Sat, 7 May 2005 19:25:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 17804 invoked by uid 207); 7 May 2005 19:24:58 -0000 Received: from keramida@FreeBSD.org by nic by uid 201 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (sophie: 3.04/2.19/3.81. Clear:RC:1(81.186.70.253):. Processed in 0.734168 secs); 07 May 2005 19:24:58 -0000 Received: from dialup253.ach.sch.gr (HELO gothmog.gr) ([81.186.70.253]) (envelope-sender ) by nic.sch.gr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 7 May 2005 19:24:57 -0000 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j47JOpEV001476; Sat, 7 May 2005 22:24:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j47JOo7A001475; Sat, 7 May 2005 22:24:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 22:24:48 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Peter Schultz Message-ID: <20050507192448.GA1401@gothmog.gr> References: <20050502201921.4F0387306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <4276C18F.1080207@freebsd.org> <200505062004.34884.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: Darren Reed cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: IPFILTER Branch [was: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 19:25:01 -0000 On 2005-05-07 10:30, Peter Schultz wrote: > Darren is on holiday, so you will not be getting a veto anytime soon. Not really. That was a joke (but I fell for it too)! > As an aside, Darren is so notorious for breaking the build, I don't > know why anyone bothers complaining anymore. I'm beginning to think > he does it just to get under people's skin. Either take away his > privileges or accept that he will be breaking the build. Darren maintains IP Filter on a lot of platforms *AND* has a real dayjob to work for. You're right about him having broken the build a few times, but that's not the end of the world. He is making an effort to fix what gets broken, after all. Let's not overreact, shall we? :-) As far as a branch is concerned, please *NO*! Anyone who wishes to maintain a separate IP Filter spinoff of CURRENT can do it using his own disk space and CVS repository (or Perforce branch, if you prefer). - Giorgos