From owner-freebsd-net Mon Apr 1 1: 4:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from bps.jodocus.org (c115139.upc-c.chello.nl [212.187.115.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B240937B417 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 01:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: (from joost@localhost) by bps.jodocus.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g31950F83113; Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:05:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from joost) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:04:59 +0200 From: Joost Bekkers To: Peter Brezny Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NATD theoretical max and tuning question Message-ID: <20020401110459.A83056@bps.jodocus.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joost Bekkers , Peter Brezny , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from peter@skyrunner.net on Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 08:06:16PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 08:06:16PM -0500, Peter Brezny wrote: > I've got a system acting as a router for about 1000 users behind various > private networks who are currently all routed through a pII 400 with 512M > ram. > > Currently all of these private networks are translated through one public > IP. > > Frequently the natd process will use more than 50% of the cpu. > This is due to a bug in natd which was fixed in 4.5-STABLE http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2878659+0+archive/2002/freebsd-questions/20020324.freebsd-questions I personally noticed the same thing, but it stopped after I upgraded natd Greetz Joost joost@jodocus.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message