From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 5 12:56:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C14D337B401 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta1.adelphia.net (mta1.adelphia.net [64.8.50.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87AD43F93 for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 12:56:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Support@Netflag.Net) Received: from nfn2.Netflag.Net ([68.69.240.35]) by mta1.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20030705200100.DZHF25556.mta1.adelphia.net@nfn2.Netflag.Net>; Sat, 5 Jul 2003 16:01:00 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030705120909.026a7df8@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> X-Sender: pedramn@pop.dc3.adelphia.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 12:19:49 -0700 To: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-performance@freebsd.org From: Pedram Nimreezi In-Reply-To: <20030705134649.5f4f7945.Alexander@Leidinger.net> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030704142253.026801a0@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> <20030626025029.71392.qmail@cr.yp.to> <200306260515.h5Q5FhPF020045@bitblocks.com> <20030626212659.51367.qmail@cr.yp.to> <20030630233353.GG96753@perrin.int.nxad.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20030704142253.026801a0@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: linux-HA X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 19:56:45 -0000 isn't it more like Eine Welt, ein Netz, ein Programm anyway.. I lose forum data, maybe it was a 4.x thing? At 01:46 PM 7/5/2003 +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >On Fri, 04 Jul 2003 14:25:08 -0700 >Pedram Nimreezi wrote: > > > I've been hearing a lot about Linux-HA (High Availability) as an avid > > Linux? not interested person > > I was wondering if there was any such construction available to freebsd... > >http://www.leidinger.net/cgi-bin/search.pl?q=cluster&num=10 > > > as opposed to like an > > taking over an IP when a specific server no longer pings... I say that > > since mysql replication doesn't > > work too well when you're load balancing using round robin A records. > > Forums lose data, stuff like that. > >I don't have hard data for load balancing, but at least for failover >situations 2 MySQL (3.23.x) servers replicate without problems here. For >more than 2 systems it is a little bit tricky. > >Bye, >Alexander. > >-- > "One world, one web, one program" -- Microsoft promotional ad > "Ein Volk, ein Reich, ein Fuehrer" -- Adolf Hitler > >http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net > GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"