From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 18 17:32:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADAE106567E for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2DA18FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:32:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 18 Mar 2011 17:32:50 -0000 Received: from f055053200.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO apollo.emma.line.org) [78.55.53.200] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 18 Mar 2011 18:32:50 +0100 X-Authenticated: #428038 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19cW54CiZFc8+HIs1pd1WtJ04D9tvyrYFQU7yHkHv Wxc1rtD0Z0A3yj Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=apollo.emma.line.org) by apollo.emma.line.org with esmtp (Exim 4.74 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0dXd-000M9G-5M for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:32:49 +0100 Message-ID: <4D839741.5090200@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:32:49 +0100 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110306 Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4D7BED01.6000506@FreeBSD.org> <201103160028.01687.avilla@freebsd.org> <241821300263308@web137.yandex.ru> <201103160933.48175.avilla@freebsd.org> <105381300365591@web53.yandex.ru> <123121300367234@web45.yandex.ru> <4D8245D4.6070705@gmx.de> <640331300457849@web22.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <640331300457849@web22.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 17:32:52 -0000 Am 18.03.2011 15:17, schrieb Konstantin Tokarev: > > > 17.03.2011, 20:33, "Matthias Andree": >> Not necessarily. If it's a documented extension that you'd allowed (and >> even by sticking to the implicit gnu89 language default of GCC) then >> you'll hardly hear back anything else than "invalid, works as documented". > > Note that Clang supports c89 and gnu89 modes[1] > > [1] http://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#c_modes With reservations, namely extensions not implemented yet, or intentionally unsupported extensions - and the list does not claim to be complete. BTW, please configure your software to not quote addresses. -- Matthias Andree