From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 6 3:26:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from m0.cs.berkeley.edu (m0.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.176]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6491501C for ; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 03:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca7-252.ix.netcom.com [209.109.235.252]) by m0.cs.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA92991; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 03:26:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@stampede.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id DAA46479; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 03:25:55 -0800 (PST) To: Chris Piazza Cc: Marcin Cieslak , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: @dirrm for share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES in PLIST References: <20000105114348.A665@norn.ca.eu.org> From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 06 Jan 2000 03:25:53 -0800 In-Reply-To: Chris Piazza's message of "Wed, 5 Jan 2000 11:43:48 -0800" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.5 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Chris Piazza * > @dirrm share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES * > @dirrm share/locale/ca * I generally don't. These directory entries aren't worth the bother * to remove just in case there's nothing left in them. I don't know if * there's a rule about this, but that's what everyone seems to be doing. We can do it the other way around if they are sufficiently "common"; i.e., add it to BSD.local.dist and remove all the @dirrm's from the individual ports. That way at least the local tree will be consistent before and after the pkg_add/delete pair. -PW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message