Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 08:07:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Daryl Chance <chancedj@yahoo.com> To: Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> Cc: Tim Kellers <timothyk@mts-128.wallnet.com> Subject: Re: portupgrade/make install problem. Message-ID: <20030714150729.84049.qmail@web9605.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030714145545.GA46755@basement.kutulu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
cool. thanks for the patch and the info. Would it be fine for me to sync the 4.8 source and just install the pkg_install utils? (pkg_*). I know the question was asked previously, but I didn't see any answer. I assume that it would be fine, but I don't want to screw something up if I do install them. PS: For some reason, yahoo has put your last 2 (this and the previous email) into, basically, the spam folder. Very wierd. --- Michael Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> wrote: > * Daryl Chance <chancedj@yahoo.com> [030714 10:47]: > > Thanks. I just saw the posts in the archive, but > not > > a patch like Mr Edenfield posted. I would like to > > propose a patch of my own. Yours looks like it > would > > work well, but it negates the FORCE_PKG_REGISTER > env > > and NO_PKG_REGISTER env (If I follow the code > > correctly). My patch just modifies the pkg_info > > command to only add -O if the OSVERSION >= 470000. > > > It's not tested since I don't know the language > syntax > > for whever code that is :). So please, feel free > to > > fix it. > > The problem is, that without the -O the entire check > fails. The -O > parameter to pkg_info takes a port origin > (basically, the relative > directory from /usr/ports of the port) and returns a > list of packages > that were originally installed from there. Without > -O, > > pkg_info -q <port origin> > > just returns an error that it couldn't find the > package. > > I did the patch in a hurry, and don't have anything > before 4.8 to test > on, but the logic seemed good to me. We don't want > to do this check > if either FORCE_PKG_REGISTER or NO_PKG_REGISTER are > defined, and can't > if OSVERSION is not at least 470000. I'll try to > find a machine to > drop 4.6 on and test today, unless someone beats me > to it. > > --Mike > > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030714150729.84049.qmail>