From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 18 06:33:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22CFF16A4CE for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C689143D31 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:33:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nospam@users.sourceforge.net) Received: from [147.47.254.184] (nospam@users.sourceforge.net) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004041822:26:33:830893.28674.2857368496 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:26:33 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <408283BB.6070803@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:33:47 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olaf Hoyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <40827EBB.2070401@users.sourceforge.net> <20040418151411.I34064@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> In-Reply-To: <20040418151411.I34064@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:2.73) (by Terrace) Subject: Re: 5-Current on Pentium-I with old hardware: still risky? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:33:50 -0000 Olaf Hoyer wrote: > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Rob wrote: > >>When I read about problems with early adoption of 5.X, I mainly >>encounter risks related to extremely large RAM, multi processors, >>or very new hardware. >> >>My simple and old Pentium-1 PC may therefore a very low risk system for >>installing 5-Current. Is that right? Or am making a big mistake here? > > > So I would say, that your hardware (given that there are more than 16MB > RAM in there) will run fine. This Pentium-1 system already runs 4-stable. For bumping it up to 5-current, would a cvsup of the sources with "tag=." be sufficient? Or is an install from scratch recommended when moving from 4-stable to 5-current? Bear in mind that these are going to be my first steps into 5-current! I realize I may have trouble with already installed ports, but there are only few so far. Rob.