From owner-freebsd-java Thu Nov 28 4:33: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC3937B401 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 04:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (ulysses.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8259543EB2 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 04:32:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mantzios@softlab.ece.ntua.gr) Received: from theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr (theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.1.1]) by ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gASBFhN04638; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:15:43 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (mantzios@localhost) by theseas.softlab.ece.ntua.gr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gASBFhS23739; Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:15:43 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:15:43 +0200 (EET) From: Mantzios Achilleus To: Jens Reiche Cc: Subject: Re: Problems with the Java-Performance Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Since we have installed freeBSD on our server, my numerical programs are >running more than five times slower with the native freeBSD-Java (v. >1.3.1) >compared to the former IBM-Java 1.3.1 on Suse-Linux 8.0. >Using the Linux-Version of Sun's JDK 1.4.1 over the binary compability >the >difference is even worse (a factor about 10!). >Does somebody know why and how I can solve this problem? I have tried native jdk1.3.1p7_2 (with hotspot build), with jboss. My app has a lot of numerical processing,server-side graphics, some EJBs, jsps,servlets and the like. After spending hours of benchmarking, i concluded that native jdk1.3.1p7_2 with GREEN threads and OpenJIT 1.1.16 is the best bet. OpenJIT really rocks! (I can beat an identical linux box running blackdown in run times). Also shujit 0.7.13 works ok too. But the native hotspot hasnt proven that usable untill now. > Jens P.S. Anybody knows what happened with the development of OpenJIT?? shujit seems quite active, whereas OpenJIT seems a little bit dead. Sure there is no massive need of JITs today with hotspot on most systems, but a good JIT engine like OpenJIT seems a must have for* BSDs (at least to me). ---------------------------------------------------------------- | go to the source -> http://www.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~mantzios | ---------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message