From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 20:01:15 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C774F16A468
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:01:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Received: from eskimo.tundraware.com (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B5613C4AD
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:01:15 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (eskimo.tundraware.com [66.92.130.161])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by eskimo.tundraware.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l5KK132T010157
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:01:05 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <4679877F.5040704@tundraware.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 15:01:03 -0500
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
Organization: TundraWare Inc.
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20060911)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Liles <al@starfishzone.com>
References: <46797FE3.7030805@starfishzone.com>
In-Reply-To: <46797FE3.7030805@starfishzone.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
	information
X-tundraware.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
	score=-4.399, required 1, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80,
	BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-tundraware.com-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's the best diagnostic utility for wireless signal?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:01:15 -0000

Andrew Liles wrote:
> I use wireless on a FreeBSD 6.1 box in an area of low signal to my
> Access Point.
> I want to be able to inspect the signal strength/quality so that I may
> adjust the antenna to get best results.  What is the best diagnostic to
> use?
> 
> For instance:
>    wicontrol wi0
> produces:
> ...
> Comms quality/signal/noise:             [ 28 47 1 ]
> dBm Coms Quality:                       [ 14 -85 -99 ]
> ...
> 
> but what is "good" or which numbers should I be seeking maximise or
> minimise?

Here's a less analytical way that may work if you have marginal signal strength:

1) Connect wirelessly
2) Start pinging a site near you (to mimimize delay effects over the larger internet)
3) Move the antenna around to see where ping delays minimize across

Similarly, you can do the same thing with traceroute which is even better because it
shows delay at each step of the route.

This is a quick-and-dirty scheme that may not always provide best results, but it's easy
and a good way to get started....