From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 24 19:34:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB39016A4B3; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B127243F85; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 19:34:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9P2YlE7071024; Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:34:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 20:34:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20031024.203411.102304139.imp@bsdimp.com> To: scottl@freebsd.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20031024165549.C77416@pooker.samsco.home> References: <200310242202.h9OM2TWs026868@repoman.freebsd.org> <20031024165549.C77416@pooker.samsco.home> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/devd devd.cc devd.h devd.hh parse.y token.l X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2003 02:34:50 -0000 In message: <20031024165549.C77416@pooker.samsco.home> Scott Long writes: : On Fri, 24 Oct 2003, Warner Losh wrote: : > imp 2003/10/24 15:02:29 PDT : > : > FreeBSD src repository : > : > Modified files: : > sbin/devd devd.cc devd.h devd.hh parse.y token.l : > Log: : > Parse the ! lines that will soon be coming from the kernel. These are : > a generalized notification mechanism for subsystems wishing to report : > events. : > : > Revieded by: njl : > : > # The kernel side seems like it might be causing panics for me, but should : > # be forthcoming shortly. : : Huh? Is there a reason why we need even less stability right now? Ummmm, the kernel parts that were unstable weren't in this area. Warner