From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Apr 27 13:49:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from empty1.ekahuna.com (empty1.ekahuna.com [198.144.200.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6515137B41E for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:49:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-02 (pc02.ekahuna.com [198.144.200.197]) by empty1.ekahuna.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:49:15 -0700 From: "Philip J. Koenig" Organization: The Electric Kahuna Organization To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2002 13:49:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Question re: Sendmail changes Reply-To: pjklist@ekahuna.com X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Message-ID: <20020427204915815.AAA795@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For a build grabbed from the source within the last 24 hours, I am now seeing the following processes for sendmail: A queue runner process owned by "smmsp". A traditional sendmail process owned by root, "accepting connections". I have sendmail_enable="NO" in my rc.conf. I thought this would have left just the queue runner process going, no? If I telnet to localhost port 25, I still see the usual banner. Do I really have to set sendmail_enable to "NONE" so it won't answer on port 25 at all? -- Philip J. Koenig pjklist@ekahuna.com Electric Kahuna Systems -- Computers & Communications for the New Millenium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message