From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Aug 15 09:01:01 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77253B34E3 for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c20008890715.133c85dba003a48787ef76ba252390c8@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BTDms1VvVz3YXc for ; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.82.1d4c20008890715.133c85dba003a48787ef76ba252390c8@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1597482061; x=1600074061; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=hmksMQRJWntY2zEBmi/h2d8bG4RBhbAeFrQrMuGK8ig=; b=wfJKHQb/6cdpyMs0O8UYzeoNTwka4YWRlbYhlfi17KQu7AtyJuUZZkuTr4Ka5mEFhvPBPvIkyE8Qt3HyRdcs6aZnSzZHipJwRdh4eofPOvl2mPz8Lk8nF4U76BM3sg3kGQr9i15MX0jGSds22tCeqWAr9AOoqtNtMXWhS03y+ps= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC45Mi4xZDRjMjAwMDg4OTA3MTUuZnJlZWJzZC1hcm09ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r1.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r1.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com [142.0.189.1]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 05:00:54 -0400 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [185.202.17.215]) by r1.us-east-2.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Sat, 15 Aug 2020 05:00:53 -0400 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1k6s3X-000E9Q-MH; Sat, 15 Aug 2020 10:00:51 +0100 Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 10:00:51 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RPi4B and self-hosted buildworld buildkernel times: using more than -j3 is a waste in my tests. Message-Id: <20200815100051.10b1d9442c2c739e36f8c7e5@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BTDms1VvVz3YXc X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=wfJKHQb/; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.82.1d4c20008890715.133c85dba003a48787ef76ba252390c8@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.82.1d4c20008890715.133c85dba003a48787ef76ba252390c8@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.51 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.08)[-1.081]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_VERYGOOD(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.993]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[142.0.176.198:from]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.74)[-0.738]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[steve@sohara.org,4250.82.1d4c20008890715.133c85dba003a48787ef76ba252390c8@email-od.com]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[yahoo.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org, 4250.82.1d4c20008890715.133c85dba003a48787ef76ba252390c8@email-od.com] X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2020 09:01:02 -0000 On Sat, 15 Aug 2020 00:23:58 -0700 Mark Millard via freebsd-arm wrote: > So: much less time required compared to the RPi4B at the > same clock rate. (The MACCHIATObin has a SATA SSD but > buildworld buildkernel is not I/O bound.) Still given the difference in price the Rpi4B doesn't come off too badly in the comparison. I keep thinking about the double shot for my next router, do you know how well it does PPPoE under FreeBSD (or anything else for that matter) ? -- Steve O'Hara-Smith