From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 12 13:54:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA6E716A41C
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:54:58 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from stsp@stsp.in-berlin.de)
Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de (einhorn.in-berlin.de [192.109.42.8])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D35043D49
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:54:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from stsp@stsp.in-berlin.de)
X-Envelope-From: stsp@stsp.in-berlin.de
X-Envelope-To: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Received: from stud.seeling33.de (p54BEACC0.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
	[84.190.172.192]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by einhorn.in-berlin.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Debian-4) with ESMTP id
	j6CDsqs8010179
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT)
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:54:54 +0200
Received: by stud.seeling33.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 50ADAF7A6; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:48:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:48:25 +0200
From: stsp@stsp.in-berlin.de
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20050712134825.GA949@stud.seeling33.de>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <20050711232642.GK39292@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org>
	<42D38178.8740.3F340A6@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <42D38178.8740.3F340A6@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
X-Spam-Score: (-1.139) AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,NO_REAL_NAME
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang_at_IN-Berlin_e.V. on 192.109.42.8
Subject: Re: Forcing a packet through an interface (OT?)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:54:58 -0000

On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 08:38:16AM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
> First, thanks to all for the suggestions.
> 
> Now, using the same scenario,
> 
> > > 1) rl0 (real.ip.no.1) ---> ISP x
> > >
> > > 2) rl1 (real.ip.no.2) ---> ISP y
> 
> Suppose 1) is down and I´m using 2). If I "ping www.google.com",
> it will go out through 2). What I really need to do is to issue
> the same "ping www.google.com" but make go out through 1) !!

In case you got a static IP on rl0 from ISP x (and rl0 is up),

	ping -I <IP of rl0> www.google.com

might help.

Just a guess though. Packets might still take the default route, even with -I.

Good luck,
--
stefan
http://stsp.in-berlin.de                                 PGP Key: 0xF59D25F0