From owner-cvs-all  Thu Aug 24 13:46: 2 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id E607437B422; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 13:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115225>; Fri, 25 Aug 2000 06:45:39 +1000
Date:  Fri, 25 Aug 2000 06:45:30 +1000
From: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/pci ti_fw.h ti_fw2.h if_ti.c if_tireg.h
 src/share/man/man4 ti.4
In-reply-to: <20000823172642.T4854@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net
 on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 05:26:42PM -0700
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG,
	cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-Id: <00Aug25.064539est.115225@border.alcanet.com.au>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
References: <200008240008.RAA67119@freefall.freebsd.org>
 <20000823172642.T4854@fw.wintelcom.net>
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 05:26:42PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>* Bill Paul <wpaul@FreeBSD.org> [000823 17:08] wrote:
>>   1.6.2.3   +1089 -978 src/sys/pci/ti_fw.h
>>   1.6.2.3   +2185 -1504src/sys/pci/ti_fw2.h
>
>ugh, isn't there a better way to do this?

I second Alfred's `ugh'.  Since the result is that v1.6.2.3 and v1.9 are
identical, couldn't this be done by moving the RELENG_4 tag, rather than
an explicit commit?  (Maybe followed by a forced commit to explain what
happened).  The only downside I see is that we lose the cronological
history for RELENG_4.  Is that history worth ~120K repo bloat?

(On a related bloat issue, why isn't the firmware treated as a KLD which
is automatically loaded and unloaded by XXattach()?).

Peter


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message