Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 31 Oct 2001 01:04:19 +0200
From:      Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net>
To:        Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        audit@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New option to sysctl(8) 
Message-ID:  <44507.1004483059@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:30:04 %2B0100." <20011029223004.B50609@heechee.tobez.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 29 Oct 2001 22:30:04 +0100, Anton Berezin wrote:

> +This option is ignored if either
> +.Fl N
> +or
> +.Fl n
> +is specified, or a variable is being set.

I'm not a big fan of this behaviour.  Could you either

a) make the last specified of -N, -n or -e override the others, or

b) make these options mutually exclusive.

Ciao,
Sheldon.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44507.1004483059>