From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 17 04:43:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB3416A41F; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:43:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mvs5.plala.or.jp (c158133.vh.plala.or.jp [210.150.158.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D32843D46; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:43:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hub.bbnest.net ([219.164.5.135]) by mvs5.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20050917044333.SFSR6132.mvs5.plala.or.jp@hub.bbnest.net>; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:43:33 +0900 Received: from [10.0.0.2] (nest.bbnest.net [10.0.0.2]) by hub.bbnest.net (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j8H4hWp2067350; Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:43:32 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from bland@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <432B9E4B.1020306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 13:40:43 +0900 From: Alexander Nedotsukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.11) Gecko/20050909 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: threads@FreeBSD.org Subject: GDB warning message. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 04:43:36 -0000 Guys, Can anyone say what is it (see warning message bellow)? (gdb) r The program being debugged has been started already. Start it from the beginning? (y or n) y Starting program: /usr/X11R6/bin/gnome-dictionary warning: Unable to get location for thread creation breakpoint: generic error [New LWP 100212] [New Thread 0x806b000 (LWP 100212)] [Switching to Thread 0x806b000 (LWP 100120)] Breakpoint 1, dict_disconnect (context=0x8277000) at dict.c:844 844 g_return_if_fail (context != NULL); This is 100% reproducible. Just run program with breakpoint set. Do we have something broken? Thanks, Alexander.